Impact of Tulsi extract on sealer penetration in dentinal tubules as compared to 17% EDTA as the final root canal irrigant (in vitro analysis)

Main Article Content

Ashar Imtiaz
Urooj Musheer
Hassan Khursheed
Salman Ahmed
Bilal Ansari

Abstract

Introduction: Penetration of endodontic sealers into dentinal tubules is essential for ensuring successful root canal treatment 
by creating a hermetic seal that prevents reinfection. Traditionally, 17% EDTA has been used as the final irrigant for smear 
layer removal. However, concerns regarding its limited antimicrobial properties and potential for dentin erosion have 
prompted the exploration of alternative solutions. This in vitro study compared the effectiveness of Tulsi extract with that of 
17% EDTA in promoting sealer penetration within the dentinal tubules. 



Methodology: Thirty extracted single-rooted teeth were randomly divided into three groups: Group 1, 17% EDTA; Group 
2, Tulsi extract; and Group 3, saline control. After preparation, the root canals were irrigated with their respective soluti ons, 
filled with gutta-percha, and sealed with a calcium hydroxide-based sealer. Sealer penetration was analyzed using scanning 
electron microscopy (SEM) at the 2 mm and 5 mm levels from the root apex. 



Results: The results showed no significant difference in sealer penetration at 2 mm among all the groups. However, at 5 mm, 
both EDTA and Tulsi groups exhibited significantly greater sealer penetration than the control group (p < 0.001). No 
significant difference was observed between the EDTA and Tulsi groups at 5 mm (p = 0.706). 



Conclusion: Tulsi extract demonstrated similar efficacy to 17% EDTA in facilitating sealer penetration, suggesting its 
potential as a biocompatible and antimicrobial alternative for root canal irrigation protocols. Further studies are warranted to 
explore its clinical applications and commercial viability. 

Article Details

Section

Original Article

How to Cite

1.
Impact of Tulsi extract on sealer penetration in dentinal tubules as compared to 17% EDTA as the final root canal irrigant (in vitro analysis). IAHS [Internet]. 2024 Oct. 15 [cited 2025 Sep. 29];1(3). Available from: https://www.lcmddsh.com.pk/index.php/iahs/article/view/34